Euljiro 3-ga Station Dermatology: Which Is Right for You, Ultherapy or Shurink?

Hello.

I’m Lee Kang-in, Medical Director at Kind Global Clinic. I listen carefully to every patient.

Ultherapy costs quite a bit more than Shurink...

Is there a big difference in effectiveness to match? Questions explored at an Euljiro 3-ga Station dermatology clinic

How do the two treatments differ?

People looking into lifting treatments at an Euljiro 3-ga Station dermatology clinic often wonder which one to choose.

I hear this question often, too, so I took a look at what people are saying in online communities.

Looking at the replies to similar questions,

I saw more people recommending Ultherapy over Shurink.

But can we really say Ultherapy is always the better treatment?

Conversely, does Shurink offer little in the way of results?

Today, I’ll compare the two treatments, focusing on their differences, effectiveness, and pain, one point at a time.

1. How do Ultherapy and Shurink differ?

When looking into lifting treatments

Ultherapy (Shurink) is a device made by the German company Merz, and it has been on the market for over 15 years.

It has long been known for its lifting effects and has continued to attract interest.

Similar devices were later developed in Korea, and Shurink is one of them.

Ultherapy = the original lifting device

Shurink = a device developed using a similar approach, explained at an Euljiro 3-ga Station dermatology clinic

That’s a simple way to distinguish between them.

Both devices use HIFU (high-intensity focused ultrasound).

They work by delivering heat energy to a specific depth beneath the skin to contract tissue and stimulate collagen regeneration.

However, they differ in the intensity of the energy and how it is delivered.

Ultherapy → delivers stronger energy with each pulse

and tends to reach relatively deeper areas,

Shurink → uses relatively gentler energy

and tends to target a broader area.

Another feature of Ultherapy is that the screen can be viewed during treatment.

This lets the practitioner see whether the energy is reaching the fat layer or the fascial layer

and deliver energy while monitoring the skin layer being targeted.

Shurink, on the other hand, does not use real-time ultrasound imaging to view the inside of the skin, so the practitioner estimates the skin layers based on experience.

To sum up the features of the two devices,

Ultherapy → a device intended to produce lifting changes through strong energy and precise delivery

Shurink → a device that aims for more natural changes with relatively less treatment intensity

That’s a helpful way to understand the difference.

2. Is there a difference in effectiveness?

What to consider before choosing a treatment

When comparing only the degree of effect, Ultherapy tends to offer more noticeable lifting.

Because it delivers strong energy precisely, it may help stimulate collagen regeneration, which can in turn lead to noticeable results.

People with pronounced sagging in the lower cheeks or along the jawline may notice a change after just one treatment,

and results generally last a relatively long time—around 6 months to 1 year.

Shurink, by contrast, delivers relatively less energy, so results may not last as long, and repeat treatments may be needed.

However, I hope you won’t assume that “a treatment with greater effects is always better.”

Ultrasound lifting can affect not only the fascial layer but also the fat layer.

If you have little facial fat or already have hollow cheeks, receiving strong energy

could actually make your face look tired.

Considering factors such as facial fat volume, skin thickness, and the direction of sagging can help you choose a treatment that comes closer to the results you want.

3. How painful is the treatment?

If you’re worried about pain

Pain varies from person to person, but many people find Ultherapy more painful.

Those who tolerate pain well may have the treatment with topical anesthetic alone, while others ask for additional anesthesia.

By comparison, Shurink is generally considered “manageable.”

Since it tends to involve less discomfort, it may be chosen by people trying a lifting treatment for the first time.

In my experience, Ultherapy seemed about 3–4 times more painful than Shurink.^^;

4. How do I choose the right treatment for me?

When deciding on a treatment, consider your current skin condition and face shape, as well as the kind of change you’re looking for.

If your jawline is noticeably sagging

If your skin has lost a significant amount of elasticity

If you want to see a change after one treatment

Ultherapy may be a good fit, and it tends to be a common choice among middle-aged and older adults.

On the other hand,

If signs of aging are not yet pronounced

If you want to maintain elasticity with natural-looking results

If you’re concerned about pain or cost

If this is your first lifting treatment

Shurink may be a practical option.

It also has advantages in terms of value for money.

So when deciding which treatment to get, rather than basing your choice solely on price or reviews,

talk thoroughly with your medical practitioner about your current skin condition and the changes you want before making a decision.

Today, we looked at how Ultherapy and Shurink differ.

Rather than having completely different principles, the two treatments differ in their goals and approaches within the broader category of ultrasound lifting.

There are also lifting devices that use different forms of energy or target different areas, such as Onda and InMode, so you may want to look into those as well.

I hope this has been helpful to anyone looking into dermatology clinics near Euljiro 3-ga Station. I’ll wrap up here.

Thank you.

[Related column you may find helpful]

Myeongdong Dermatology: Does Onda Body Lifting Work? This One Article Has You Covered—With References to Research Papers

Kind Global Clinic Myeongdong Branch

02-318-2888